What say did they have in how they wanted to be represented virtually?In addition, her text questions what their silences meant to the experience of race on the Internet.

Is this a question of identity management or is this a progressive future where we can have self-definition without societal influences?

Lisa Nakamura dispels the myth that the Internet is a utopic space where individuals can be race-less entities leaving behind the stigmatizing identity (race) of real life.

Cybertype is taken from the word stereotype which was a "mechanical device that could reproduce images relatively cheaply, quickly, and in mass quantities" (4).

Nakamura coins the perfect word for this extended metaphor which she carries successfully throughout her book.

Situated specifically within the realm of cultural studies and new media studies, Nakamura's In examining this post bodied construction, Nakamura first addresses the concept of the digital divide.

Within the digital divide are the poor and people of color in America who were not at the "ground floor" of the creation, facilitation and perpetration of the Internet; therefore, Nakamura astutely surmises the need to analyze how this absence impacts the way race is discussed and experienced on the Internet.

She contends that the silence gives the Internet a "whitewashed" perspective, where users assume that the people with whom they are interacting are white.

What would it be like to erase your identity and assume a new one instantly?

Imagine that you could morph into any entity you wanted to be; who would you be?

A cybertype is "the distinctive ways that the Internet propagates, disseminates, and commodifies images of race and racism" (3).

Additionally, it explores multiple dimensions of Internet access and application, including issues of culture and race in cyberspace.